Nutrient Criteria Development

Freshwater Nutrient Criteria

The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires all states to consider nutrient criteria for all waters.  Nitrogen and phosphorus are nutrients that are natural parts of aquatic ecosystems and are necessary for the growth of algae and aquatic plants, which provide food and habitat for fish, shellfish and other organisms. Unlike many water contaminants for which criteria have been established, nutrients typically do not exert primary effects on aquatic life by acting as toxicants. Too much nitrogen and phosphorus in the water can cause algae to grow faster than ecosystems can handle. Significant increases in algae due to nutrient over-enrichment can harm water quality, food resources and habitats, and decrease the oxygen that fish and other aquatic life need to survive.  Some algal blooms are capable of producing toxins that are harmful to aquatic life and/or human health.

This web page provides information related to past and current efforts to develop criteria designed to protect Virginia surface waters from harmful effects of nutrient over-enrichment.

blue green algae cellNutrient Criteria Development for Flowing Surface Waters

James River Chlorophyll a Criteria Study

Lake & Reservoir Nutrient Criteria 

Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Criteria & Other Links

 

Nutrient Criteria Development for Streams & Rivers.  An Academic Advisory Committee (AAC), a group composed of academics and scholars from Virginia colleges and universities, has been advising DEQ on nutrient criteria development since 2003. Activities have included providing general advice and perspectives to initiate the criteria development process in 2003-2004 and advising and technical development of criteria for lakes and reservoirs, now completed.  Current efforts focus on advising and technical development of criteria for wadeable streams and non-wadeable rivers.

 Technical Development Documents  Meetings & Presentations

2006AAC Literature Review for Rivers &  Streams
        - AAC Report 2006

2007AAC Rivers & Streams Report 2007
        - Freshwater Nutrient Criteria for Non- wadeable Streams in Virginia: Fish Community Assessment: Phase 1

2008 - Freshwater Nutrient Criteria for Non-wadeable Streams in Virginia: Fish Community Assessment: Phase 2

2009 - AAC Report 2009 - Wadeable Streams
        - AAC Report 2009 - Non-Wadeable Rivers

2010 - AAC Report 2010- Wadeable & Non-Wadeable Streams & Rivers

2012AAC Report 2012 - Wadeable  Streams

2012 - Technical and Policy Considerations and Options in Assessing Nutrient Stresses on Freshwater Streams in VA

Stakeholder Meeting - August 18, 2004  
Overview 
AAC Recommendations 
Algal Monitoring 

Stakeholder Meeting - October 23, 2006         

Overview - DEQ
Current AAC recommendation status
Presentation - Va. Association of Municipal Wastewater Agencies (VAMWA)  

Stakeholder Meeting - June 12, 2008

Wadeable streams nutrient criteria development - current status (DEQ)
The Screening Value Approach (Dr. Carl Zipper)
Using Fish Community-Based Measures of Stream Health to Develop Nutrient Criteria for Virginia Streams and Rivers (Dr. Greg Garman)
Perspectives on Nutrient Criteria Development - VAMWA

James River Chlorophyll a Criteria Study.  DEQ is undertaking a comprehensive review of the existing James River Site-Specific Numeric Chlorophyll-a Criteria and associated modeling framework for the tidal James River to determine the best scientific basis for the standard. This effort is being initiated as a result of the Chesapeake Bay TMDL Phase I Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP).

 Technical Development Documents  Meetings & Presentations

2004 - DEQ Technical Report - Chlorophyll a Numerical Criteria for the Tidal James River

2005James River Alternatives Analysis

2007Chesapeake Bay & Tidal Tributaries - Chlorophyll Criteria addendum -(See Chapter VI for chlorophyll a characterization of Harmful Algal Bloom)

2008Chesapeake Bay & Tidal Tributaries - Technical Support for Criteria Assessment Protocols addendum -

2010Chesapeake Bay & Tidal Tributaries - Technical Support for Criteria Assessment Protocols addendum 

2011Factors Determining the Location of the Chlorophyll Maximum and the Fate of Algal Production within the Tidal Freshwater James River - Bukaveckas et al

EPA web page - Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP)

EPA web pageHarmful Algal Bloom (HAB) Information

VCU James River Chlorophyll A Research web page

Meeting of Science Advisory Panel - Monday, August 22, 2011

Summary 

Overview/Background - DEQ 
Algal Blooms in the tidal-freshwater James River - Paul Bukaveckas 
Blooms in the Lower James River - Margie Mulholland 
Bloom Producing Algae in Virginia Waters - Harold Marshall 
Modeling Algae-Nutrient Responses in the James River - Clifton Bell

Meeting of Science Advisory Panel - October 14, 2011 

Summary
James River Chlorophyll-a Study
Comprehensive Work Plan

Presentations 
Research Needs for Upper Tidal James River
Research Needs for Lower Tidal James River
Draft Modeling Work Plan

Meeting of Science Advisory Panel - May 3, 2012

Summary
Presentations
2011 Upper Tidal James River Monitoring Summary- VCU 
2011 Lower Tidal James River Monitoring Summary - HRSD 
Lower Tidal James River - Algae Blooms - ODU 
2011 Phytoplankton Monitoring Summary - ODU
Modeling Support for James River Chlorophyll Study - CEC

Stakeholder Advisory Group - Informational Meeting - August 27, 2012 

Minutes 
James River CHLa Study - Background Information
Science Advisory Panel activity to date

Meeting of Science Advisory Panel - November 2, 2012

Presentations 
2012 Data Collection in the Upper James - VCU 
Phytoplankton Community Analyses - ODU 
Lower James Dataflow Results - VIMS/HRSD 
2012 Data Collection in Lower James - ODU 
Lower James Toxicity Studies - VIMS 
Update & Discussion of Modeling Activities - CEC

Meeting of Science Advisory Panel - April 26, 2013

Presentations 

Minutes
Introduction & Highlights of 2012 Findings – Bukaveckas 
Proposed Work for 2013 – Schlegel 
Primer on the Phytoplankton Model – Fitzpatrick 
Overview of Modeling Report – Jasinski 
Watershed Inputs & Critical Conditions – Parker 
Modeling Support for James R. Chlorophyll Study – Shen 
Historical Analysis of James R. Water Quality Data – Wang 
James River Reference Curves – Fitzpatrick 

Lake & Reservoir Nutrient Criteria

 Technical Development Documents

AAC Report 2004                                             AAC Lake Dissolved Oxygen Response
AAC Workplan 2005                                         AAC 2005 Report Addendum 1
AAC Report 2005                                             AAC 2005 Report Addendum 2 

Link to Criteria:

Reservoirs (9VAC25-260-187)          Natural Lakes (9VAC25-260-310 special standards "cc" and "dd")

Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Criteria & Other Links  

 DEQ Links  Links to Other Agencies

Chesapeake Bay Criteria (9VAC25-260-185)

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP)

Chesapeake Bay Program

Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Cleanup Plan  (EPA web site)

EPA Nutrient Information (EPA web site)

VA Dept Health - Harmful Algal Blooms 

 

footer divider
footer divider
footer divider
Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality
629 East Main Street
P.O. Box 1105
Richmond, VA 23218
(804)698-4000

Advanced Search
Privacy Statement | Terms Of Use | WAI Compliance | Contact Us